Today, catastrophic messages often form the picture of technology. Seveso, Bhopal, Chernobyl, the recent Rhine disaster – more and more people see these events as a warning sign of a development that continues to cause greater risks to January 2019 Crowd Calendar humans and the environment. And fewer and fewer citizens appreciate the benefits that come their way here, so much so that these risks in their entirety still seem justifiable.
January 2019 Crowd Calendar
Hardly anyone seriously denies that technical progress has brought significant benefits in the past. Life expectancy increased, private wealth increased, people experienced more personal freedom.However, humankind benefits from these blessings of technology to varying degrees; So many people in the Third World have often only experienced the dark side of progress.And even in the highly industrialized countries, it has become increasingly clear in recent decades that new technologies are not always the solution to previous problems but also dangers.
On a small scale, it may be the subsequently discovered health hazard posed by a beneficial substance, such as formaldehyde – on the whole, a potential global greenhouse effect from the use of fossil fuels. What appears to be harmless in the firing of a single boiler can become a global hazard if it is used by the millions.The more clearly this dual-skill of technical development gains in the consciousness of the people outlines, the louder becomes the call for a socially and ecologically responsible use of the technical progress.
The sciences themselves, who are indeed involved in the discovery and development of new technologies, should use their resources more for the limitation of harmful consequences, it is called. And politics, which has for decades considered the promotion of technical progress to be its task, may finally become active We are committed to shaping the development of technology.
As plausible as these demands are, they are so difficult to realize, as it seems so far. In many cases, scientists still lack the standards for the size dimensions of the benefits and risks of individual techniques; this is all the more difficult as often in the process of scientific review measurement techniques and techniques are developed that make the risks of a hitherto considered harmless technology identifiable. Above all, there are no concepts to weigh the pros and cons of a technical innovation.
When thinking about such concepts, it becomes clear how central is a broad assessment of the merits and risks of such techniques for our lives and our environment. What may seem desirable from a procedural point of view does not necessarily have to be favorable under labor market policy aspects.What becomes medically possible does not necessarily have to be socially acceptable.
What is technically feasible in terms of military technology may seem questionable from a security point of view.Concepts for risk and benefit assessment – in short – always need a political dimension.But for a long time politics, and especially Parliament, has been struggling to recognize the medium and long-term effects of technological change as a central task.January 2019 Crowd Calendar Parliament has behaved rather reserved, probably because it was often confronted with extremely contradictory information about the dangers of some technology.