Misjudgment of some of the effects of technological development can not always be ruled out in principle by the “technology assessment”, as this concept is called somewhat January Calendar For 2019 unhappy in German.However, there is widespread agreement that Technology Assessment (TA) can bundle existing knowledge in such a way that the political decision-making process is more rational, factual and competent.
January Calendar For 2019
Parliamentary TA can – and this is its great advantage – confront any parliamentarian with any knowledge of the consequences and consequences of a technology application that we have at the time when we have a political decision.Many experts in this country, who have made themselves knowledgeable about the work and successes of the OTA, confusedly note how little benefit German policy has drawn from American experience.
Above all, they are surprised at how slowly the German Bundestag deals with the question of whether, like other European countries, it too can not make the example of the US Congress fruitful for itself.Since 1973, the German Bundestag has been discussing the creation of a consultancy similar to the OTA. But it remained for many years in declarations of intent and frequent information trips to the OTA.
The gap between programmatic demands and willingness to act became even wider as time progressed: at the beginning of the seventies, at least occasionally, forms of consultation were contemplated that were comparable to the OTA in terms of size and target catalog.But then the task of such a body in the political declarations was increasingly extended, while at the same time their potential size was increasingly reduced.
For example, in 1978 a model was proposed involving five employees and a budget of one million marks – whereas in that year, research and development of technology was funded with eight billion marks from the federal government’s budget. The discussion about the Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag began to assume features of a posse.
Astonishingly, there were not even (party) political conflicts that hampered the creation of a TA institution. Although such initiatives were usually taken by the respective opposition in the parliament, until October 1982 by the CDU / CSU parliamentary group; but there were several requests from individual members of all political groups – but they found in the General Parliament but no response.On the whole, the small progress made in this case seems to be more related to a certain sense of parliamentary work among the majority of Members of all political groups, as was recently made clear in the discussions after the Chernobyl accident
.It prefers to debate the politically culprits for a confusing information policy instead of actively and systematically discussing the long-term design needs of the energy supply.Where individual MPs think beyond this meager consensus, they find on the higher floors of all groups apparently little active support. While in the USA parliamentarians demanded and enforced the January Calendar For 2019 establishment of the OTA on the political weight of Senator Kennedy, who himself has a large own advisory board, Technology Assessment remained the hobbyhorse of a few members of parliament in this country.